Harmonic organization.

Let's examine the differences between a conventional and harmonic organization, using as an example two companies: 

Conventional company. 
The company has a frame at reception touting its mission and values​​. 
People in the company, according to the position they occupy say: "My Company", "our company" or "their company".
There is a control system frequency.
Notices,are placed with instructions about behaviors and / or administrative procedures.
On the bulletin board there are a warning: "From this date ....".
The company has a labor lawyer.
Those who occupy leadership positions are dedicated to maintaining the pace of production, distributing tasks, checking the quality, avoid waste and other activities inherent in the command. 
When the company wants to highlight an employee promote him to a more important position, to be able to pay more, riskless of wage parity.
The company usually keep a good communication system, issuing warnings or giving suspensions as warnings that something is wrong.
In the ex-works,those who hold volumes are examined.
Some employees participate in profits, proportional to the wage level.
There is a table of positions and salaries and stimulates functional progress, usually indicated by the manager.
The company gets along well with the renewal of the frames, which is seen as something natural and avoids accommodations.
Costs are compatible, and the company does not "miracles".
Statements of possession or wealth that can generate constraints are avoided.
Many meetings of heads are made and avoids "initiatives" that have not been approved by the rightful person.
In the year-end festivities, highlights the spirit of harmony existing in the company.
Economic data such with sales, orders, inventory, etc.. are known only to those who have to deal with.
Each one should stick to his task as if everyone does what it should be the satisfactory result.

Harmonic company. 
Everyone is aware of the company's goals and your way of being.
When referring to the company all say: "our company".
There is no control of work time.
In the last five years there was no labor dispute.
All do work, no one is only as chief.
People receive the market value, no more, no less.
No warnings communications or suspensions.
There is no volume control at the exit of the job.
All have share in the profits, in proportion to their participation and not in proportion to their remuneration.
There are not contests for positions because there is no table of positions and salaries.
In the last five years no one resigned for reasons of maladjustment at work.
The company works with lower costs than the competition.
The businessman when car exchange does not feel embarrassed to appear with the new car.
Who has to take decision, take it, without shirk of responsibility.
The entrepreneur does not make speeches saying "we are a family ...".
All data regarding sales, costs, and expenses, are available to all.
 People know what need to do, what is produced, who the customers are, and are very safe.

Food Industries.

The food industry has acted irresponsibly with respect to the health of its users.
Have used chemicals that could be avoided and provided highly harmful products, as exemplified in this critical text: GasCola

“Justice really is blind, it does not see the injustices committed in their name”.

Read more:

Multiple lives.

The extraordinary ability of some people excel at certain activities can be easily explained by the collection of previous and simultaneously experience in this segment.

An architect develops wonderful and challenging projects, certainly from experienced architectural solutions by it in other insertions of life.

The poet who dazzles us all with lovely messages that touch our sensibilities, certainly did not generated this feature starting from scratch when he was born. 

The writer who confesses that he loses control of his characters when he writes a book, is telling us that his book is an account of his previous and / or concurrent experiences, even why in many of these books there are autobiographical aspects.

Lately many youth has dazzled and amazed by the creation of electronic marvels, generated by minds that do certainly are using experiences of previous lives.

The denial of these and many other evidences that can be cited is contrary to logic and needs no comment.

How could avoid evil?

"The protestor is a nonconformist with injustice. The accommodated is a conniving."

Reed more.

How could avoid evil?

Our social structure based on guilt and responsibility, has not worked. Never we live with so much violence. Virtually all of us are prisoners of a violent and irresponsible society, determined by collective behavior.

When we walk the streets and identify social problems, our reaction is to turn your back, because we think it does not concern us. After all, we pay taxes and we argue that governments should take responsibility for these social misfits.

People employed in conventional administrations are treated as children and not as responsible adults. The irony is that, even so, thousands of others want to receive this treatment because they are unemployed.

We keep in prisons thousands of other people who have committed crimes related to petty theft, and we have greater tolerance to important persons who stole much. Justice really is blind, it does not see the injustices committed in their name.

We maintain many privileged that are distracted making speeches and generating useless laws, when what they should do is to solve social problems. They transform the mandate on business desk.

We accept absurd wage distortions, paying these privileged with funds raised by taxes pay by the poor, when they consume products essential.

We live with corruption accepting this as inevitable. For us it is a fait accompli and we respect the offender as someone who deserves our admiration for to be rich.

In fact, we are very unjust and we pay for this injustice. In a world based on injustice is too easy to someone to take antisocial behavior. In fact, the behavior of this individual is not a cream, or atavistic responsibility, but a consequence of an absurd social structure. He was a just world, surely his misconduct would be much less bearable and the society. Ourselves is that we create a society, ie, the medium

The wave of violence that afflicts and torments our social life is generated by ourselves. Nobody is so discrepant from a social order. Are distortions of social structure generating the unacceptable behavior.

The origin of evil.

Let's try go to the source of the evil. Imagine a fetus in the pregnancy process. By definition we consider the innocent newborns. If we are all born innocent, why some become criminals?

One might think that is a bad character, but if so, the innocent would have been born to be criminal and, in fact, would not have responsibility, because had no opportunity of choice.

We may do not accept this genetic determinism, but we will have to assign to education that received the innocent, or to the environment, the responsibility for the fact of having become a criminal. Again it is unfair to blame someone for the education received, or the environment where he lives. The possibility of coexistence of the two factors gives no truth to each, much less to the whole.

A third hypothesis of the innocent to have come into this world marked to be what in reality he become, ie, a criminal, and that determinism was established by himself as "consciousness" which adopted a human body. This hypothesis contradicts the fact that only the harmonic energy is recorded in the "individualized consciousness".

Finally, we can imagine that the person within their free will, has decided to become a criminal. Would be a person bad, even though genetically well-formed, and having had a blameless education. Corroborating this hypothesis, there are numerous cases of criminals whose brothers are good people. That is, take yourself a criminal is the free will. The crux of the matter is if the evil can be a choice freely assumed by one person.

Only in this case we would consider someone guilty for acting badly . Surely it would be simpler and more convenient, assign to free will the responsibility, but it does not exist and it is easy to prove, as it is easy to identify the cause of problem.